
And that is without any of my 18TB archive drives being plugged in, thus without their data accounted for - and yet it is already hard to read
And to further fuel my argument: it is stated here https://www.voidtools.com/support/every ... ize_format, that if Value of >>0<< is applied to statusbar_size_format then the Status Bar will show size in a mode of >>Auto (Bytes/KB/MB/GB depending on size)<<
And so my question is: why users are unable to have such choice also for the Column of Size? I reckon that it is because the sorting feature has to stick to one unit of size in order to be able to execute the sort order correctly?
So what I propose in regards to this Size Column is to:
A) give users ability for choosing unit(s)
B) give users ability for choosing auto-unit mode
C) give users ability for choosing when exactly auto-unit is to kick in
D) give users ability for choosing when exactly auto-unit is to be stopped from being applied
E) give users ability to ditch or change separators between thousands, million and billions [and so on for future proofing]
I myself would choose auto-unit with a caveat of MB as the lowest unit - i.e. I would not see e.g. 100 KB but 0.10 MB, but I would not see 1,010 MB nor 1 010 MB or 1010 MB but 1.01 GB and I would still see 999.99 GB but then 1.00 TB as the next possible value. Others however might want to see 100 KB, then [following numbers from my example] 1-010-000 KB and then 999-999-000 KB and for whatever reason as the next possible value 1.00 TB. [Yes, I know: there is still needed 999 KB of data to fill in before reaching this change]