Either a bug or something very unintuitive...
If I search dimensions: it only seems to do a "begins" match, or of the width element, whereas I want a "part" or ww: match of the whole. It's hard to pin down what it's actually doing.
(Basically, since I have the dimensions column showing, it makes sense to do a search on that rather than on width: height:)
d
Dimension search peculiarities
-
void
- Developer
- Posts: 19899
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Dimension search peculiarities
dimensions: will always do a whole match.
What searches have you tried any what results did you see?
Syntax is:
widthheight
and operators can be used, for example:
dimensions:>1920x1080
dimensions:<320x200
Use for ranges:
dimensions:320x200..640x480
If you specify only the width, all heights will match.
For example:
dimensions:1920
will match:
1920x1080
1920x1200
dimensions:
What searches have you tried any what results did you see?
Syntax is:
dimensions:x<>dimensions:>1920x1080
dimensions:<320x200
Use
..dimensions:320x200..640x480
If you specify only the width, all heights will match.
For example:
dimensions:1920
will match:
1920x1080
1920x1200
dimensions:
-
meteorquake
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:44 pm
Re: Dimension search peculiarities
Basically I was doing a search for two dimensions which needed to be width and height in either order (obviously photos may be vertical or landscape), so 4608 x 3456 or 3456 x 4608, and so was doing a search for 4608 (since that would capture both and nothing else given my photo sizes).
I think orientation-agnostic searches are going to be quite common.
However
doesn't work since dimension:"3456 x 4608" also captures "3456 x 2592" which is part of what I meant by the search being peculiar, so the results were more than I expected and I had to resort to using an equation with width: and height:
what could be useful would be to be able to use a syntax that ignores orientation e.g.
dimension:"4608&3456" or dimension:"?4608 x 3456" so as to find 4608 x 3456 or 3456 x 4608
or perhaps sizing:"4608 x 3456" with sizing: (or some such thing) ignoring orientation.
David
I think orientation-agnostic searches are going to be quite common.
However
Code: Select all
dimension:"4608 x 3456"|dimension:"3456 x 4608"what could be useful would be to be able to use a syntax that ignores orientation e.g.
dimension:"4608&3456" or dimension:"?4608 x 3456" so as to find 4608 x 3456 or 3456 x 4608
or perhaps sizing:"4608 x 3456" with sizing: (or some such thing) ignoring orientation.
David
-
void
- Developer
- Posts: 19899
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Dimension search peculiarities
Remove the space.
For example:
I will add support for spaces in the next alpha update.
Thank you for the suggestion.
For example:
dimension:4608x3456|dimension:3456x4608dimension:4608x3456;3456x4608I will add support for spaces in the next alpha update.
I have put on my TODO list to add a single function to search dimension:4608x3456|dimension:3456x4608dimension:"4608&3456"
Thank you for the suggestion.
-
void
- Developer
- Posts: 19899
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Dimension search peculiarities
Please consider a short macro to search any orientation:
In Everything, from the Search menu, click Add to filters....
Change the Name to: Dimensions Any Orientation
Change the Search to:
Change the Macro to: di
Click OK.
Now you can search for which expands to:
In Everything, from the Search menu, click Add to filters....
Change the Name to: Dimensions Any Orientation
Change the Search to:
Code: Select all
dimensions:[ELEMENT:$param:,"x",1]x[ELEMENT:$param:,"x",2];[ELEMENT:$param:,"x",2]x[ELEMENT:$param:,"x",1]Click OK.
Now you can search for
di:4608x3456dimension:4608x3456;3456x4608-
void
- Developer
- Posts: 19899
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Dimension search peculiarities
Everything 1.5.0.1401a will now eat the spaces in dimensions:"320 x 200"