Everything Service's 'Number' may not reflect Everything version

Discussion related to "Everything" 1.5.
Post Reply
therube
Posts: 5723
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm

Everything Service's 'Number' may not reflect Everything version

Post by therube »

Everything Service's 'Number' (if there is such a thing) may not reflect Everything's version number.


Service shows as a "quasi" 1389/1390
or is it 1389 in a 1390 directory?


typically what i do before "installing" new version...

- Quit (all -instances)
- Copy existing "instalDir" (numerically numbered) to current version (numerically numbered)
so i had /1389/ & i copy that to /1390/
at that point, /1389/ & /1390/ are identical


then i either
- Everything.exe -uninstall-service (from within /1389/ dir)
or
- Copy Everything.exe (1390) into /1390/, & then
- Everything.exe -uninstall-service (from within /1390/ dir)

so... i may have used either 1389.exe or 1390.exe to do the -uninstall-service
then, if i had not already done so above, i Copy 1390.exe into /1390/ dir

- Everything.exe -install-service (from within 1390 dir)
at that point, Everything Service is (again) running.


now, depending on which way i went about it above,
uninstall with 1389.exe, install with 1390.exe,
or
uninstall with 1390.exe, install with 1390.exe,
if i look at the Service, & even though 1390.exe /was/ used to do the -install-service,
i get an odd display(?) of the service, as if it were still 1389
(well, as far as i can make of it)


if i then (& all with 1390.exe)
-uninstall-service
then
-install-service
the Service then /displays?/ correctly
.
Everything - Service shows quasi 1389 1390.png
Everything - Service shows quasi 1389 1390.png (17.52 KiB) Viewed 3918 times

& i'll note, that i actually get two (time separated, a second or so) notifications
of an -uninstall-service ?
.
Everything - Service (change) notification displays 2x.png
Everything - Service (change) notification displays 2x.png (21.5 KiB) Viewed 3918 times

maybe it is an idiosyncransy of the System Informer program?
(as in i also don't know how that "2nd" SI icon ended up there [shot #2], as it is "not" [there]
- maybe it was there momentarily, too short for the eye to catch?)


(i didn't see any such "version number" noted from within Windows Services itself.)
horst.epp
Posts: 1642
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: Everything Service's 'Number' may not reflect Everything version

Post by horst.epp »

You only need one Service running
regardless of the number of Client instances.
tuska
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:14 am

Re: Everything Service's 'Number' may not reflect Everything version

Post by tuska »

2therube

If and as long as Everything 1.5 Alpha is used, you can create the file: NO_ALPHA_INSTANCE (without file extension)
in the program directory.

Then the 'Everything Service' will always be called 'Everything', even with multiple instances or versions.
Reference: How to have 1.5 not use 1.5a .db .ini

In my opinion, uninstalling the 'Everything Service' due to a version change is also not necessary at the moment.
I am aware of two solutions in which the Everything Service is only temporarily stopped but not uninstalled:

1. Everything.ini

Code: Select all

stop_service_on_exit=1
   - OR -

2. Bookmark with Keyboard shortcut: ALT+X (my preferred variant)
   Search Custom:

Code: Select all

   /stop-service
   /exit
   
therube
Posts: 5723
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm

Re: Everything Service's 'Number' may not reflect Everything version

Post by therube »

> You only need one Service running

I only have 1 running.
But when I -uninstall-service (System Informer) seems to indicate that the deletion occurred twice.
At least it displays the "Service Deleted" message, twice.
Post Reply