Sorry for my confusion:
So "Folders" is not the right option to use if you want automatically your external drives being scanned each time you plug in them, is it right?
Please consider converting your external drives to NTFS for this functionality.
So really convert the file systems of the drives and then use the "NTFS" tab.
To keep offline volumes in Everything 1.4 or later:
In Everything, from the Tools menu, click Options.
Click the NTFS tab.
Uncheck Automatically remove offline volumes.
Click OK.
When enabled, keep offline volumes will:
Allow offline volumes to stay in the index.
Not rebuild the database when the volume goes offline.
Automatically update the index when the volume comes back online with out doing a full rebuild.
Rebuild the database if a volume has changed too much.
Detect changes to the volume while it is online.
Offline indexes will be lost when the index is rebuilt. All volumes must be online when Everything builds its index.
I would think this
"Offline indexes will be lost when the index is rebuilt. All volumes must be online when Everything builds its index."
means the opposite of this
"To keep offline volumes in Everything"
It means, if I see it right, indexes of drives being offline will be lost when Everything (re)indexes. So there is no way to keep indexes of offline drives.
"(Attempt to) Monitor changes" means something different in "NTFS" and "File lists" and "Folders".
So Everything does not monitor the content of file lists but the file (itself) / the file attributes, such as date, time, size and if one of them has changed (for exampel because one has added (or removed from the list) some files to the file list and saved it) it reloads the file / its content automatically (that is "Monitor changes" for file lists).
Folders indexes do monitor changes to file names.
At special / set times (not automatically when a drive is plugged in). The same way like NTFS does it all the time, I could imagine. May be one could set "Rescan" to "Every" 3 minutes or so. So an external drive plugged in would then be scanned most likely. But I assume,
So both "File lists" and "Folders" (are not suitable to be used the way I would like to do it. So I could let Everything just scan like usual the files using the NTFS function. But after a (re)scan the offline volumes were gone, is it correct?
Depending on how you closed Everything, the process is still running without it being shown in Task Manager's application list.
I closed it by clilcking "Exit" in the context menu shown after clicking the icon in the system tray.
In Task Manager, If you go to the Details tab (Win10) / Processes tab (Win7) Everything is probably still there.
You can right-click on the Everything process(es) and select "End process tree" to end it.
No, no, it was not shown anymore in the Task Manager.
Everything has to do it's housekeeping (writing database, etc), so give it a minute ...
Yes, but that will be interrupted by closing it with the Task Manager, I suppose.
Close ThisIsMyFile too. Maybe that's also locking your external drive (Don't know; I tested it once and decided I stick with my regular tools (Process Explorer and on the CMD prompt: TASKLIST, TASKKILL, WMIC, HANDLE)
Yes, I had closed it before clicking "Savely remove"
BTW: A CMD version to (force) stop all running Everything.exe's:
Code: Select all
for /f "usebackq tokens=2 delims= " %X in (`tasklist ^| findstr /i /b "everything"`) DO taskkill /F /PID %X
[code][/quote]
Thank you. I use ProcessKO or something like that. I will try next time the code.
[quote]If that doesn't work, start downloading Process Explorer and handle.exe to prepare for the next round .... ;-)
These utlities can be found here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/[/quote]
Thank you for the link, yes, I have it on my drive.
[quote]BTW: You might want to change the screenshots. Now we see the settings of E: and I: drive instead of H: (and there is still a name visible (description of the I: disk))[/quote]
Ah, yes, I missed it, thank you.
[quote]Missed all these messages while I was writing mine... You can ignore my message.[/quote]
No, no, those are good thoughts.